About your Search

20121128
20121206
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> gangnam style. >> there is a lot to be said for a wealth tax and especially a concrete wealth tax. >> bill: far left beginning to push for wealth tax that means the feds would confiscate private property. this is being kept very quiet but tonight you will hear all about it? >> gay marriage or accepting immigrants. >> you are absolutely right. they don't want to believe it's time to change it. >> rhode island governor chafee saying he will not save christmas because the times are a changing. we sent jesse wawfortsz -- watters up to rhode island to find out what the heck is going on. >> isn't it discriminating against christians by calling it a holiday tree? >> caution. you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor begins right now. >> bill: i'm bill o'reilly, thanks for watching us tonight. america need leaders. in order to turn the country around -- and boy do we need that -- good leadership will have to step up. that means politicians who put you ahead of their own welfare. elected officials who are honest, intelligent and daring. we need that kind of leadership. it's one of the rea
. this week, treasury secretary tim geithner offered the president's plan. it would raise taxes for high earning americans by $1.6 trillion over the next decade. that's on income, capital gains and dividends. also limit deductions for those folks. also return the estate tax to a whopping 45% for wealthy families. but on the spending front. there really isn't anything substantial on the table. nothing. the president basically saying i'm not going to cut much. and blank you if you don't like it. >> it's not just a bad deal. this is really an insulting deal. what geithner offered what you showed on the screen. robert e. lee was offered easier terms and he lost a civil war. they there not only no cuts in this, there is an increase in spending with a new stimulus. this is almost unheard of. i mean, what do they expect? they obviously expect republicans will cave on everything. now, i don't think president obama expects the republicans to cave. he wants them to oppose. believing the american people will become angry at the g.o.p. it's a political strategy putting the entire country at risk. ma
taxes. >> the people taking the oath, the oath that he oath purpose of destroying the u.s. government. it's a kind of anarchist proposition it's a pretense that the government is completely useless and should be destroyed. therefore it is kind of a is a dishes oath, treasonous oath. people who take that oath cannot actually serve in the government with good conscience because their real role is to act as a mole and to destroy the government. >> bill: i guess is he a mind reader in addition to being a professor. here now fox business anchor john stossel. all right, now, thurman, that professor teaches at columbia private college. went to princeton private college and they can do whatever they want. that's not the discussion here. once you get into the state university systems in all five states have them then i'm paying and you are paying for these guys to run wild. shouldn't there be some kind of imposed balance? >> affirmative action for conservative thought on campus. >> they should do that but they should do it on their own. columbia isn't clean. they get lots of government money t
and leaves to avoid the unions and taxes. i'm a fan of samuel l. vaction jacuzzi and i will apologize apologize -- jacuzzi and i will apoll jackson. the movie takes place in l.a. >> forgive me for explaining the point. in california they used to shoot most of the movies in los angeles, hollywood. the film capital of the world. but the expenses are so now onerous because of the unions, regulations, environmental, on and on and on, that the movie companies headed mostly by liberal individuals an samuel l. jacuzzi is certainly one of those. shoot everything in canada, all of their principles of labor go flying out the window. california loses all of that revenue that they used to have because of all the craziness. is that the point you were trying to make there, carolla? >> right. it's exactly the point very eloquently made. and, like i said, he is a business. and he moves. other businesses go to texas and they stay there for good. and that's what's happening in-to-california. california, honestly, is like a hot blonde high school chic who has been getting by on her looks, never having t
one. 63 million after all the taxes and shenanigans came into your pocket. $63 million. you are -- were, i should say and still are. but i will explain that. a white collar worker. you are a professional man. so you get 63 million dropped on you. what was the worst thing about it? >> the news media on my front yard. to be quite honest with you. you know, you are going through a huge turmoil and all of a sudden, you know, someone who comes from a quiet background all of a sudden i have got, you know, 45 trucks parked across the street from my house. it's a little unnerving right after all this happened. >> bill: consequence of these people they go away after a while. what was the consequence of having that kind of public exposure? >> well, you know, people, at least in my case, people view us kind of as a pariah. i mean, i have had people i have known for 25 years tell me they couldn't stand the sight of me anymore. >> bill: did they articulate why? >> most of them said because i won and they didn't. and i kind of said well, look, it's the luck of the draw. >> bill: flat out
are mandated to pay this tax or have a fine. that was thrown out on a technicality. now the supreme court yesterday said hey, lower court, you should have heard another claim that they brought the university brought, having nothing to do with the mandate, but having to do with forcing this university to provide abortion and contraceptive care. >> bill: the abortion care, that's the after pill that you're talking about? >> the after pill abortion, right. >> bill: all right. so liberty university doesn't want to include that in their insurance to their employees for religious reasons. >> it does not make sense. >> bill: it makes sense to me, but this thank is what the catholic church was arguing. so the supreme court told the lower court, you have to hear this. >> the 4th circuit said this isn't right because it hasn't taken effect yet. it has to be an issue that is present before them. it's not. so now they said, go back and decide it. you should decide it on the merit because the issue is ripe. so now they can't avoid it any longer. >> bill: but it's interesting -- >> it was missed by the
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)